<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WCF: Efficient Buffer Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kennyw.com/work/indigo/51/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kennyw.com/work/indigo/51</link>
	<description>Kenny Wolf</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:20:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ajander Singh</title>
		<link>http://kennyw.com/work/indigo/51/comment-page-1#comment-403281</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajander Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 09:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kennyw.com/indigo/51#comment-403281</guid>
		<description>thanks for nice article. It has solved my problem as i was getting an &quot;The size necessary to buffer the XML content exceeded the buffer quota.&quot;

thanks again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for nice article. It has solved my problem as i was getting an &#8220;The size necessary to buffer the XML content exceeded the buffer quota.&#8221;</p>
<p>thanks again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Efficient Buffer management – Reduced LOH allocation &#124; MSDN Blogs</title>
		<link>http://kennyw.com/work/indigo/51/comment-page-1#comment-399804</link>
		<dc:creator>Efficient Buffer management – Reduced LOH allocation &#124; MSDN Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 20:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kennyw.com/indigo/51#comment-399804</guid>
		<description>[...] http://kennyw.com/indigo/51 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://kennyw.com/indigo/51" rel="nofollow">http://kennyw.com/indigo/51</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenny</title>
		<link>http://kennyw.com/work/indigo/51/comment-page-1#comment-296126</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kennyw.com/indigo/51#comment-296126</guid>
		<description>For large messages, GC is more efficient</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For large messages, GC is more efficient</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://kennyw.com/work/indigo/51/comment-page-1#comment-295930</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kennyw.com/indigo/51#comment-295930</guid>
		<description>Thanks!
Can you explain why it can be better to avoid pooling for large messages please?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!<br />
Can you explain why it can be better to avoid pooling for large messages please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://kennyw.com/work/indigo/51/comment-page-1#comment-192869</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kennyw.com/indigo/51#comment-192869</guid>
		<description>Thanks, I have been searching and flogging my WCF app for quite a while to work out why it was consuming too much memory, and it turned out MaxBufferPoolSize was the answer, I was setting this way too big (having been ignorant of what it was when originally configuring things). With big messages (~2MB) this was a total disaster for the large object heap which, with heavy usage, ends up getting very out of hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, I have been searching and flogging my WCF app for quite a while to work out why it was consuming too much memory, and it turned out MaxBufferPoolSize was the answer, I was setting this way too big (having been ignorant of what it was when originally configuring things). With big messages (~2MB) this was a total disaster for the large object heap which, with heavy usage, ends up getting very out of hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kennyw.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; TcpTransport&#8217;s Buffer Management in WCF</title>
		<link>http://kennyw.com/work/indigo/51/comment-page-1#comment-89269</link>
		<dc:creator>kennyw.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; TcpTransport&#8217;s Buffer Management in WCF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kennyw.com/indigo/51#comment-89269</guid>
		<description>[...] for larger messages (i.e. &gt; 4MB). Usually this switch is combined with a tweak of your MaxBufferPoolSize in order to avoid memory [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for larger messages (i.e. &gt; 4MB). Usually this switch is combined with a tweak of your MaxBufferPoolSize in order to avoid memory [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

