<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TcpTransport&#8217;s Buffer Management in WCF</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kennyw.com/work/indigo/229/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kennyw.com/work/indigo/229</link>
	<description>Kenny Wolf</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:20:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Niels la Cour</title>
		<link>http://kennyw.com/work/indigo/229/comment-page-1#comment-181122</link>
		<dc:creator>Niels la Cour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kennyw.com/indigo/229#comment-181122</guid>
		<description>Using NetTcpBinding, StreamedResponse, no signing, no encryption, security mode none, I have measured that WCF itself allocates a total of approximate 116 KB of managed memory server side for every stream, that is, the overhead is independent of how many bytes are transferred through the stream, and the overhead is big...

Can you please look at this issue?

Thanks,
Niels</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using NetTcpBinding, StreamedResponse, no signing, no encryption, security mode none, I have measured that WCF itself allocates a total of approximate 116 KB of managed memory server side for every stream, that is, the overhead is independent of how many bytes are transferred through the stream, and the overhead is big&#8230;</p>
<p>Can you please look at this issue?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Niels</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

