<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Manipulating HTTP Headers in your WCF Message</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kennyw.com/work/indigo/153/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kennyw.com/work/indigo/153</link>
	<description>Kenny Wolf</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:20:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kenny</title>
		<link>http://kennyw.com/work/indigo/153/comment-page-1#comment-268043</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kennyw.com/indigo/153#comment-268043</guid>
		<description>What is the custom header you added? Is it a request header or a response header?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the custom header you added? Is it a request header or a response header?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vivek</title>
		<link>http://kennyw.com/work/indigo/153/comment-page-1#comment-267969</link>
		<dc:creator>vivek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kennyw.com/indigo/153#comment-267969</guid>
		<description>Hi, 
I tried to add the custom HTTP header in the WCF routing service, the code is same as above. However this is found that added HTTP header was deleted in the WCF service. 

Any help and suggestions?  This is urgent one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I tried to add the custom HTTP header in the WCF routing service, the code is same as above. However this is found that added HTTP header was deleted in the WCF service. </p>
<p>Any help and suggestions?  This is urgent one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adding a Message Header without using a MessageContract &#171; Sajay&#39;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://kennyw.com/work/indigo/153/comment-page-1#comment-208185</link>
		<dc:creator>Adding a Message Header without using a MessageContract &#171; Sajay&#39;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 05:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kennyw.com/indigo/153#comment-208185</guid>
		<description>[...] headers.But then again you might just want to add a header without going downt that route like this post&#160;by [Kenny]. You generally come across 2 scenarios where you want to add headers in every [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] headers.But then again you might just want to add a header without going downt that route like this post&nbsp;by [Kenny]. You generally come across 2 scenarios where you want to add headers in every [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenny</title>
		<link>http://kennyw.com/work/indigo/153/comment-page-1#comment-128888</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kennyw.com/indigo/153#comment-128888</guid>
		<description>Saran, does your code work if you aren&#039;t adding the HTTP header? This doesn&#039;t sound like an HTTP-related issue.

Steve, you can add a ClientMessageInspector via a behavior to do what you intend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saran, does your code work if you aren&#8217;t adding the HTTP header? This doesn&#8217;t sound like an HTTP-related issue.</p>
<p>Steve, you can add a ClientMessageInspector via a behavior to do what you intend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Pack</title>
		<link>http://kennyw.com/work/indigo/153/comment-page-1#comment-127572</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Pack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 07:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kennyw.com/indigo/153#comment-127572</guid>
		<description>Hi Kenny,

Thanks for the sample. Is there any way to have that code execute for every call to the client? I&#039;m trying to do exactly what you are doing there, but with an interceptor/inspector/behavior defined in configuration.

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kenny,</p>
<p>Thanks for the sample. Is there any way to have that code execute for every call to the client? I&#8217;m trying to do exactly what you are doing there, but with an interceptor/inspector/behavior defined in configuration.</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saran</title>
		<link>http://kennyw.com/work/indigo/153/comment-page-1#comment-115662</link>
		<dc:creator>Saran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 11:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kennyw.com/indigo/153#comment-115662</guid>
		<description>Hi,
When I tried your code snippet, the connection is getting closed abruptly. Using the wcftestviewer.exe, I 
am seeing the following details in the log file.
The Exception type: EndpointNotFoundException. The message is There was no channel that could accept the message with action.

The warning message says that,
The incoming message is not part of the existing security session.

Any help?

Thanks,
Saran</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
When I tried your code snippet, the connection is getting closed abruptly. Using the wcftestviewer.exe, I<br />
am seeing the following details in the log file.<br />
The Exception type: EndpointNotFoundException. The message is There was no channel that could accept the message with action.</p>
<p>The warning message says that,<br />
The incoming message is not part of the existing security session.</p>
<p>Any help?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Saran</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenny</title>
		<link>http://kennyw.com/work/indigo/153/comment-page-1#comment-101278</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 18:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kennyw.com/indigo/153#comment-101278</guid>
		<description>Is this on your request or response? I would recommend posting on the WCF forum for this question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this on your request or response? I would recommend posting on the WCF forum for this question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall Brooke</title>
		<link>http://kennyw.com/work/indigo/153/comment-page-1#comment-94176</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall Brooke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kennyw.com/indigo/153#comment-94176</guid>
		<description>Hi Kenny,

Do you know why the Cache-Control header is always overwritten with plain ol &quot;private&quot; no matter what you set it as.

best

Marshall</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kenny,</p>
<p>Do you know why the Cache-Control header is always overwritten with plain ol &#8220;private&#8221; no matter what you set it as.</p>
<p>best</p>
<p>Marshall</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kennyw.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Suppressing Expect 100-Continue on your Requests</title>
		<link>http://kennyw.com/work/indigo/153/comment-page-1#comment-12035</link>
		<dc:creator>kennyw.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Suppressing Expect 100-Continue on your Requests</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 02:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kennyw.com/indigo/153#comment-12035</guid>
		<description>[...] WCF has a very powerful extensibility mechanism around modifying HTTP headers. However, you will get tripped up if you try and modify the &#8220;Expect: 100-Continue&#8221; header on outgoing requests. This is because System.Net will (by default) add this header on outgoing requests. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] WCF has a very powerful extensibility mechanism around modifying HTTP headers. However, you will get tripped up if you try and modify the &#8220;Expect: 100-Continue&#8221; header on outgoing requests. This is because System.Net will (by default) add this header on outgoing requests. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

