<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mountain Top Dining (Whistler, BC)</title>
	<link>http://kennyw.com/food/168</link>
	<description>Kenny Wolf's Thoughts of the Moment</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Kenny</title>
		<link>http://kennyw.com/food/168#comment-34652</link>
		<author>Kenny</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 02:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kennyw.com/food/168#comment-34652</guid>
		<description>Correct, SP2 has been required on XP for all the betas and for RTM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct, SP2 has been required on XP for all the betas and for RTM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Seely</title>
		<link>http://kennyw.com/food/168#comment-34633</link>
		<author>Scott Seely</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kennyw.com/food/168#comment-34633</guid>
		<description>If you look at the linked page, you'll see this was released on 5/22/2006. This change was required for COM+ and MSDTC to work properly with the late betas and RC of WCF. I think SP1 is a mistake in the bulletin-- I'm pretty sure that SP2 has been required for quite a while in order to get HTTP.SYS support. Am I remembering correctly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you look at the linked page, you&#8217;ll see this was released on 5/22/2006. This change was required for COM+ and MSDTC to work properly with the late betas and RC of WCF. I think SP1 is a mistake in the bulletin&#8211; I&#8217;m pretty sure that SP2 has been required for quite a while in order to get HTTP.SYS support. Am I remembering correctly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enrico</title>
		<link>http://kennyw.com/food/168#comment-32935</link>
		<author>Enrico</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kennyw.com/food/168#comment-32935</guid>
		<description>Any workaround for this problem? 

Because under System Requirements on Update for Windows Communication Foundation (KB912817)
 : one can see Windows XP Service Pack 1

here's the link

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=86B93C6D-0174-4E25-9E5D-D949DC92D7E8&#38;displaylang=en

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any workaround for this problem? </p>
<p>Because under System Requirements on Update for Windows Communication Foundation (KB912817)<br />
 : one can see Windows XP Service Pack 1</p>
<p>here&#8217;s the link</p>
<p><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=86B93C6D-0174-4E25-9E5D-D949DC92D7E8&amp;displaylang=en" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=86B93C6D-0174-4E25-9E5D-D949DC92D7E8&amp;displaylang=en</a></p>
<p> <img src='http://kennyw.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenny</title>
		<link>http://kennyw.com/food/168#comment-32934</link>
		<author>Kenny</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kennyw.com/food/168#comment-32934</guid>
		<description>Correct. You should upgrade to SP2, which also has a bunch of security fixes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct. You should upgrade to SP2, which also has a bunch of security fixes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enrico</title>
		<link>http://kennyw.com/food/168#comment-32898</link>
		<author>Enrico</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kennyw.com/food/168#comment-32898</guid>
		<description>Meaning I can't get a win application (With WCF) to run on Windows xp Service pack 1?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meaning I can&#8217;t get a win application (With WCF) to run on Windows xp Service pack 1?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenny</title>
		<link>http://kennyw.com/food/168#comment-32719</link>
		<author>Kenny</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 01:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kennyw.com/food/168#comment-32719</guid>
		<description>If you mean XPSP2, yes Service Pack 2 is required on Windows XP for all of .Net 3.0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you mean XPSP2, yes Service Pack 2 is required on Windows XP for all of .Net 3.0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enrico</title>
		<link>http://kennyw.com/food/168#comment-32596</link>
		<author>Enrico</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kennyw.com/food/168#comment-32596</guid>
		<description>Kenny, I have a major problem regarding WCF installation. 
is it possible to install WCF Without Service pack 2?
If it's not, I'll take us a few months back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kenny, I have a major problem regarding WCF installation.<br />
is it possible to install WCF Without Service pack 2?<br />
If it&#8217;s not, I&#8217;ll take us a few months back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
